DD WHAT CONSTTUTES A SUCCESS IN STATINGA COGNIZABL
CLAIM, UPON WIICH RELIEF CAJ BE GRANTED?

HOW DCES A COURT REACH THE CONCUSION THAT A
PLAINTIPF HAS FAILED TO STATE A CLAIM IN WIICH RELIEF MA
BE GRATED ?

DOES THE PRISCW LITIGATION REFORM AOT, P.L.R.A. JOUSCS
(9ISC9) IUFRINGE UPON THE U.S COUSTITUTTONS-ISTAMENME
RIGHTS, TO ADRQUATELY AECESS THECOURT AND SEEK REDRESS OP.
GRiEVANCES ?

④ CAN BOTH FEDERAL COURT'S ALLOW A PLAINTIPF TO PROCEEC
I FORMA PAUPORIS, WITHOUT PREPAYNEUTOF FILINS PEES THEN STILL
CHALGE PLAINTIPF YOO OO AINg ROe i Te U.S.DISTRICTCOURT
ADD $SOS.0O REE TO ANANTAD THE APEAL OF THE PRSTAETON

CAN THE COURT USE PRETEKT PAWCY STATUTORY LADGURG
IN ITS SAUDAD OF REVIEN REACHNG A PREETERMINE
DUTENT TO CHARGE PIANTIFF JO% MONTALY PAMENTS FORTHE
HQOS.OO PILNG FEE THEN ULTiMATELY DISMISS THE LAWSUTE
ITS APPEAL WITHCUT RERWDING UNACCESSEd FECS P

⑥WHEN IS IT A FOEM OF FEDERAL JUDICIAL EMBEZZEMEN
IF PLANTIPP GAN DEMOSSTDATE AO PROUE, THE COURT'S ARE COSTINLIS
NAUECOLUPT ORGAIZATOS, 1OUSCSIAB2 RIC.O AFT?

IS ALL THE COURTS D THE UWITED STATE'S OF AMERICA GOING
TD CONTUE QULNG WITH LAWLESSJESS, BIAS AND BRRORNEOUS
DISCRiMINAtIOS? AD IF SO, WHEN Did YOU, ABOLISH YOUR aWN
CONSTITUTONS?

Whether the courts constitute a success in stating a cognizable claim for relief when a plaintiff has failed to satisfy a claim's elements, as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure