Whether the limitations on ex post facto judicial decision-making that this Court recognized in Bouie v. City of Columbia and Rogers v. Tennessee, and which are inherent in the notion of due process, prevent state courts from retroactively applying a good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule to the detriment of a defendant when the unforeseeable change in law occurred after the defendant's crime, charge, and trial.

Whether the limitations on ex post facto judicial decision-making that this Court recognized in Bouie v. City of Columbia and Rogers v. Tennessee, and which are inherent in the notion of due process, prevent state courts from retroactively applying a good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule to the detriment of a defendant when the unforeseeable change in law occurred after the defendant's crime, charge, and trial