Donald Higgs, aka Kyle Beachum v. New Jersey
DueProcess FourthAmendment FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
was states failure to subpoena victim to grand jury for first hand knowledge,but relied on known fabricated police reports and testimony of officer improper, requiring dismissal of indictment?
Did States failure to recite required Statuttory Elements when having presented charges to grand jury violate grand jury proceedings?
Should trial Court had dismissed indictment after viewing video footage that established Petitioners innocence?
Should trial Court had dismissed indictment after victims own testimony at trial that suspect looked like juror number nine?
Should trial Court had recused itself after having been named a defendant in a Civil Action filed?
Should District Court had dismissed defendant's prosecutor,both public defenders and trial judge amid magistrate judges acknowledgement of illegal arrest and prosecutorial misconduct?
Was termination of Application for Emergency Relief erroneous with good cause shown and on the merits?
was the district courts denial of habeas Corpus and denial of cert. of appealability in violation of clearly established laws?
is the Courts failure to file Motions and letter brief citingthe Petitioners entitlement to relief and release a violation of rights under the Constitution?
Is the appellate courts affirmance of conviction a violation of clearly established laws?
Whether the state's failure to subpoena the victim to the grand jury and instead rely on fabricated police reports and officer testimony violated the petitioner's rights