No. 18-7109
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-charging criminal-law criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process juror-consensus jury-consensus ohio-constitution rape-allegations united-states-constitution
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is "carbon copy" charging of multiple allegations of rape violative of due process and/or double jeopardy pursuant to the United States and Ohio Constitution and/or violative of due process under Article I, Section 10 of the Ohio Constitution?
Does "carbon copy" charging of multiple allegations of rape violate a defendant's due process rights as to juror consensus?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is 'carbon copy' charging of multiple allegations of rape violative of due process and/or double jeopardy pursuant to the United States and Ohio Constitution and/or violative of due process under Article I, Section 10 of the Ohio Constitution?
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-15
Waiver of right of respondent Ohio to respond filed.
2018-11-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 18, 2019)
Attorneys
Ohio
Ralph Michael Rivera — Mahoning County Prosecutor's Office, Respondent
Tshombe Miller
Tshombe Miller — Petitioner