No. 18-7097

In Re Leigh Jesse Quinto

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2018-12-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: bond-case bond-v-united-states civil-rights collateral-review constitutional-law due-process federalism habeas-corpus new-rule retroactivity standing supreme-court
Latest Conference: 2019-01-11
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did the Supreme Court's decision in Bond v. United States, 131 S. Ct. 2355, 180 L. Ed. 2d 269, decided June 16, 2011 (hereinafter "Bond I"), establish a "new rule of constitutional law"?

If so, should the new rule of constitutional law announced in Bond v. United States, supra, be made retroactive to cases on collateral review?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Supreme Court's decision in Bond v. United States establish a new rule of constitutional law?

Docket Entries

2019-01-14
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
2018-10-26
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

Leigh Jesse Quinto
Leigh Jesse Quinto — Petitioner