No. 18-7080
Yusufu Danmola v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitution constitution-law constitutional-interpretation court-jurisdiction criminal-procedure due-process judicial-review legal-enforcement separation-of-powers standing statutory-interpretation uniform-commercial-code
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment SecondAmendment HabeasCorpus Securities
DueProcess FourthAmendment SecondAmendment HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is the Court Allowed to Enforce a Law not in Pursuance with the Constitution?
Are The People Prohibited Liberty Of Usage of the Uniform Commercial Code in the Criminal Court?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the Court Allowed to Enforce a Law not in Pursuance with the Constitution?
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 17, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Yusufu Danmola
Yusufu Danmola — Petitioner