No. 18-7068
Nelson Figueroa v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: alleyne almendarez-torres apprendi apprendi-rule constitutional-protections due-process due-process-clause federal-sentencing-guidelines jury-trial prior-conviction prior-conviction-exception sentencing-guidelines sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
The first question for the Court is, in light of the Guidelines' development into the de facto range of punishment in all but a very small percentage of cases, whether the rule of Apprendi must apply to the Guidelines to comport with the constitutional protections of due process and jury trial. The second question for the Court is whether Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S. Ct. 1219 (1998), was wrongly decided and must be overruled.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the rule of Apprendi must apply to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines to comport with the constitutional protections of due process and jury trial
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 16, 2019)
Attorneys
Nelson Figueroa
Jeffrey Michael Brandt — Robinson & Brandt, P.S.C., Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent