WHETHER PETITIONER'S "PRIOR STATE DRUG OFFENSES" QUALIFIED AS ENUMERATED OFFENSES UNDER THE "CAREER CRIMINAM" PROVISION OF THE UNITED STATES SENTENCING GUIDELINES?

WHETHER. THE DISTRICT COURT IDENTIFIED A "BASE LEVEL" FOR THE OFFENSE OF CONVICTION AND ADJUSTED THAT LEVEL TO ACCOUNT FOR CIRCUMSTANCES SPECIFIC PETITIONER'S CASE? ROSALESMIRELES V. UNITED STATES.

WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT EMPLOYED A PROPER ANALYSIS OF A DIVISIBLE STATUTE - UNDER THE MODIFIED CATEGORICAL APPROACH - IN DETERMINING WHETHER PETITIONER'S PRIOR STATE CONVICTIONS CONSTITUTED "QUALIFYING OFFENSES" UNDER THE CAREER OFFENDER PROVISION OF THE UNITED STATES SENTENCING GUIDELINES? MATHIS V. UNITED STATES.

WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT COMMITTED "PLAIN ERROR" WHEN SENTNECING PETITIONER AS A "CAREER OFFENDER" BASED ON STATUTE(S) WHICH HAVE BEEN DECLARED "DIVISIBLE" WITHOUT CONDUCTING A PROPER "MODIFIED CATEGORICAL ANALYSIS" AND THEREFORE CALCULATING PETITIONER UNDER AN INCORRECT OFFENSE LEVEL UNDER THE GUIDELINES?

Whether petitioner's prior state drug offenses qualified as enumerated offenses under the career criminal provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines