No. 18-7066
Raymond Jones v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel en-banc-review jurisdiction petition-for-rehearing rehearing rule-60b6 standing subject-matter-jurisdiction wilkins-precedent
Latest Conference:
2019-03-22
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF APPEALS IS INVALID BECAUSE THE DISTRICT COURT LACKED SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION TO ADJUDICATE RULE 60(b)(6) MOTION?
WHAT REMEDY IS AVAILABLE FOR PETITIONER WHEN PRIVATE COUNSEL ATTORNEY FAILED AND REFUSED TO FILE A TIMELY PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC?
WHETHER WILKINS V. UNITED STATES, 441 U.S. 468 (1979) ENTITLES DEFENDANTS TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL WHEN SEEKING REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to adjudicate Rule 60(b)(6) motion
Docket Entries
2019-03-25
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-03-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-02-08
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-01-14
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-31
Supplemental brief of petitioner Raymond Jones filed. (Distributed)
2018-12-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
2018-12-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 16, 2019)
Attorneys
Raymond Jones
Raymond Jones — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent