No. 18-7046
Tomas Liriano Castillo v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-procedures-act agency-regulations article-iii article-iii-courts article-iv congress due-process notice-and-comment possessions rule-making territories territories-and-possessions united-states-possessions united-states-territories
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Is Congress required to establish Article III courts in the United States Territories and Possessions?
2. Under the APA, and its definition of "rule making," is there an exception for republication of an agency rule that is editorial in nature, or is the republication subject to the statutory notice-and-comment requirements?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is Congress required to establish Article III courts in the United States Territories and Possessions?
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 14, 2019)
Attorneys
Tomas Miguel Liriano Castillo
Joseph A. DiRuzzo III — DiRuzzo & Company, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent