1. Whether a student and student organizations
investigated for possibly violating a public
university's regulations governing on-campus
speech have standing to bring a First
Amendment challenge to the vagueness and
overbreadth of the regulations where the
university declined either to clarify the
regulations or disavow future enforcement?

2. Whether a public university's anti-harassment
policy violates the First Amendment where it
authorizes the university to restrict speech based
on broad, vague, and undefined terms, and does
not require that prohibited speech be objectively
offensive?

3. Whether a public university violates the First
Amendment when its campus speech regulations
lack any process for screening insubstantial or
frivolous complaints and its investigative procedures impose burdens on speakers, including a
gag order, during pendency of the investigation?

4. Whether university officials are entitled to
qualified immunity when they enforce university
anti-discrimination policies by placing the burden
on speakers to justify their engagement in controversial speech?

Whether students have standing to challenge university speech regulations