No. 18-7035

Eminiano A. Reodica v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-12-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure district-court evidentiary-hearing federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure guilty-plea motion-to-withdraw plea-withdrawal rule-11
Latest Conference: 2019-01-11
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(d) governing motions to
withdraw a guilty plea establishes a liberal standard which precludes the
district court from resolving factual disputes without an evidentiary hearing.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(d) governing motions to withdraw a guilty plea establishes a liberal standard which precludes the district court from resolving factual disputes without an evidentiary hearing

Docket Entries

2019-01-14
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
2018-12-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main Document
2018-12-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 14, 2019)
PetitionAppendixAppendix

Attorneys

Eminiano Reodica
Carlton Frederick Gunn — Kaye, McLane, Bednarski, and Litt, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent