Clifton Stanley Diaz, Jr. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
U.S. COURT OF APPENCS FOR TNE D.C. CIRAMIT D.D NOT
RESPOND TO THE MOTION SEEKING MONETARY DAMAGES
BECAUSE THE COURT WAS REVIEWING THE ORDER FICED
FIVE DOYS EROM
ANAIL 17,2018.
DC CAW STOTES THAT IF THE COULT
IGNORES THE MOTION,
−
IM NOLOW BHSS NO hOLS H BO 21
BOTH PARTIES APPEAL?
SO IF THE U.S. COURT OF APPEPLS FOR THE D.C.
DID NOT RESPOND TO THE MOTION SEEKING
CRAUT
MONETARY
DAMDGES, IS THE PLAINTIFF ASKIN6
FOR HIS
JoB
BACK?
DC COW STOTES THAT IF THE COURT IONORES THE
MOTION, IT MUST
BOMD hd No bots Dnd
MOtION,
THE PLAINTE ENTITLED TO BACKPAY
IS
ANO
HIS
JOB BACK?
Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit erred in denying the plaintiff's request for monetary damages and reinstatement to his job