No. 18-7002

Clifton Stanley Diaz, Jr. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2018-12-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appeal appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law damages default-judgment due-process employment judicial-review legal-procedure motion reinstatement remand standing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)

U.S. COURT OF APPENCS FOR TNE D.C. CIRAMIT D.D NOT
RESPOND TO THE MOTION SEEKING MONETARY DAMAGES
BECAUSE THE COURT WAS REVIEWING THE ORDER FICED
FIVE DOYS EROM
ANAIL 17,2018.
DC CAW STOTES THAT IF THE COULT
IGNORES THE MOTION,

IM NOLOW BHSS NO hOLS H BO 21
BOTH PARTIES APPEAL?
SO IF THE U.S. COURT OF APPEPLS FOR THE D.C.
DID NOT RESPOND TO THE MOTION SEEKING
CRAUT
MONETARY
DAMDGES, IS THE PLAINTIFF ASKIN6
FOR HIS
JoB
BACK?
DC COW STOTES THAT IF THE COURT IONORES THE
MOTION, IT MUST
BOMD hd No bots Dnd
MOtION,
THE PLAINTE ENTITLED TO BACKPAY
IS
ANO
HIS
JOB BACK?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit erred in denying the plaintiff's request for monetary damages and reinstatement to his job

Docket Entries

2019-02-19
Petition DENIED. Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2019-01-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2018-08-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 14, 2019)

Attorneys

Clifton Stanley Diaz
Clifton Stanley Diaz Jr. — Petitioner