No. 18-6999
IFP
Tags: circuit-court civil-procedure district-court-errors due-process exceptional-importance exxon-mobil-precedent exxon-mobil-v-saudi-basic federal-courts federal-jurisdiction judicial-review jurisdiction rooker-feldman rooker-feldman-doctrine sixth-circuit-errors standing subject-matter-jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
The District Court has subject matter jurisdiction to decide whether Rooker-Feldman applies to cases filed in federal court before the state Court action has ended.
The judgment of the sixth circuit and district court conflicts with This Court's Decision in Exxon Mobil Corp. V. Saudi Basic Industries Corp. 544 U.S. 280(2005).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District Court has subject matter jurisdiction to decide if Rooker-Feldman applies to cases filed in federal court before the state court action has ended
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2018-10-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 11, 2019)
Attorneys
John McQueen
John McQueen — Petitioner