Whether it is legal, lawful, and constitutional for states to manipulate distinctly explained statutes in order to present charges. Consequently, charging the specified act of committing a crime based on the states presumed intent for a defendant to commit a crime versus charging a crime based off of the intent of an actual committed crime.

Whether there is sufficient evidence to justify the charging of a crime without the involvement of a criminal act or corpus delecti. Should a court charge a defendant with a specified offense if the offense was never committed.

Whether it is legal, lawful, and constitutional for states to knowingly falsify documentation (perjury) in order to charge a crime that specifically states an overt act even when the crime was not committed, but was presumed to have a possibility of occurring.

Whether it is legal, lawful, and constitutional for states to manipulate distinctly explained statutes in order to present charges