Whether reasonable jurist would debate that the State failed to meet its burden of proof of beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Van Nortrick is guilt.

Whether reasonable jurists would determine that it was reversible error for the district court to permit Mr. Van Nortrick's involuntary statements that were the product of duress, inducements, and/or promises to be presented to the jury, over defense counsel's objections.

Whether reasonable jurist would debate that the State failed to meet its burden of proof of beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Van Nortrick is guilty