Should this court resolve the split between the Fourth and Eleventh Circuit about the probity of the fact that a vehicle is a rental in the reasonable suspicion calculation? Compare United States v. Smith, 799 F.2d 704, 707 (11th Cir. 1986) (rental in a 'drug corridor' insufficient to create reasonable suspicion); United States v. Bowman, 884 F.3d 200 (4th Cir. 2018) (following the Eleventh Circuit), with United States v. Camran, No. 17-50404, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 21041 (9th Cir. July 30, 2018) (unpublished) (rental status significant in reasonable suspicion determination).

Should this court resolve the split between the Fourth and Eleventh Circuit about the probity of the fact that a vehicle is a rental in the reasonable suspicion calculation?