1. Whether under Martinez v. Ryan, 132 S.Ct. 1309 (2012), a prisoner confined pursuant to a Tennessee Judgment may assert ineffective assistance of initial-collateral-review counsel as cause to excuse the procedural default of a substantial claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel when Tennessee's procedural rules consider the complete only upon exhausting the 1ATC claims through the TCCA and and initial-collateral counsel failed to properly exhaust this substantive IATC claim?

Whether under Martinez v. Ryan, a prisoner confined pursuant to a Tennessee Judgment may assert ineffective assistance of initial-collateral-review counsel as cause to excuse the procedural default of a substantial claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel