No. 18-6906

David E. Miller v. Tony Parker, Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Correction, et al.

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-12-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: coercion cruel-and-unusual-punishment death-penalty eighth-amendment ex-post-facto execution-method lethal-injection waiver waiver-of-rights
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)

(1) When an inmate alleges that both his original and later-imposed punishments for the same crime violate the Eighth Amendment but the later-imposed punishment will cause greater pain and suffering, does the Ex Post Facto Clause require the inmate to also show the later-imposed punishment is "sure or very likely' less humane?"

(2) Is a waiver of Eighth Amendment rights invalid when induced by a State's threat to impose a harsher punishment than allowed at the time of the crime?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

When an inmate alleges that both his original and later-imposed punishments for the same crime violate the Eighth Amendment but the later-imposed punishment will cause greater pain and suffering, does the Ex Post Facto Clause require the inmate to also show the later-imposed punishment is 'sure or very likely' less humane?

Docket Entries

2018-12-06
Application (18A578) referred to the Court.
2018-12-06
Petition DENIED. Justice Sotomayor dissents. (Detached Opinion)
2018-12-06
Application (18A578) denied by the Court. Justice Sotomayor dissents. (Detached Opinion)
2018-12-05
Reply of petitioner David E. Miller filed.
2018-12-04
Brief of respondent Tony Parker, et al. in opposition filed.
2018-12-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 2, 2019)
2018-12-03
Application (18A578) for a stay of execution of sentence of death, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.

Attorneys

David Earl Miller
Stephen Michael KissingerFederal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee, Petitioner
Tony Parker, et al.
Jennifer L. Smith — Respondent