Question Presented (from Petition)
When a jailer detains a person for an extended period with no access to a court hearing for arraignment and bail review, in violation of his or her Due Process rights, can the jailer avoid liability under § 1983 on the ground that the state court caused the violation because it bears sole responsibility for setting such a hearing?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When a jailer detains a person for an extended period with no access to a court hearing for arraignment and bail review, in violation of his or her Due Process rights, can the jailer avoid liability under § 1983 on the ground that the state court caused the violation because it bears sole responsibility for setting such a hearing?
2019-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-15
Reply of petitioners Mariano Moya, et al. filed.
2019-02-01
Brief of respondents Robert Garcia, et al. in opposition filed.
2019-01-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 1, 2019.
2019-01-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 25, 2019 to February 1, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-12-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 25, 2019.
2018-12-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 26, 2018 to January 25, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-11-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 26, 2018)
2018-09-27
Application (18A326) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until November 23, 2018.
2018-09-25
Application (18A326) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 8, 2018 to November 23, 2018, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.