No. 18-6885

Stephen Anthony Marquez v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-11-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: business-records confrontation-clause constitutional-amendments crawford-v-washington criminal-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment medical-records sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)

With the decision to classify testimonial or non-testimonial statements per Crawford v. Washington 124 S.t 1354 as to whether Confrontation clause applies my questions are;

Does Due Process to cross-examine still apply in all criminal cases when possible? (i,e not dying declarations, ongoing police emergencies, criminal activities such as co-conspirator conversation unknowingly wire tapped, or competency to stand trial) or has Due Process as guaranteed by the United States Constitutional Amendments Six and Fourteen also not applicable?

Do business record privileges apply to medical records to nullify cross-examination and due process as guaranteed by the United States Constitution Amendments Six and Fourteen?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does Due Process to cross-examine still apply in all criminal cases?

Docket Entries

2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2018-07-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 31, 2018)
2018-05-08
Application (17A1238) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until July 27, 2018.
2018-03-10
Application (17A1238) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 28, 2018 to July 27, 2018, submitted to Justice Alito.

Attorneys

Stephen Anthony Marquez
Stephen Anthony Marquez — Petitioner