Stephen Anthony Marquez v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
With the decision to classify testimonial or non-testimonial statements per Crawford v. Washington 124 S.t 1354 as to whether Confrontation clause applies my questions are;
Does Due Process to cross-examine still apply in all criminal cases when possible? (i,e not dying declarations, ongoing police emergencies, criminal activities such as co-conspirator conversation unknowingly wire tapped, or competency to stand trial) or has Due Process as guaranteed by the United States Constitutional Amendments Six and Fourteen also not applicable?
Do business record privileges apply to medical records to nullify cross-examination and due process as guaranteed by the United States Constitution Amendments Six and Fourteen?
Does Due Process to cross-examine still apply in all criminal cases?