#1 IS THE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT VOID WHEN IT WAS BASED ON STATEMENTS FROM SPECIAL AGENT TERRANCE TAYLOR STATEMENTS THAT WERE KNOWINGLY FALSE AND EXHIBITED RECKLESS DISREGARD FOR THE TRUTH TO DETERMINE PROBABLE CAUSE AND LATER AT TRIAL HE TESTIFIED CONTRARY TO HIS SWORN AFFIDAVIT?

WAS THE INDICTMENT INSUFFICIENT ESP:WHEN IT FAILED TO STATE AN OFFENSE?

#3, DID THE INDICTMENT FAIL TO. ALLEGE EACH MATERIAL ELEMENT OF THE OFFENSE?

#41 DID THE DISTRICT COURT LACK SUBJECT MATTER OF JURISDICTION?

#5, DID THE DISTRICT COURT COMMIT FRAUD IN THIS CASE?

#61 CONSIDERING THE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT WAS BASED ON FALSE STATEMENTS,AND THE INDICTMENT FAILED TO STATE AN OFFENSEIAND DID NOT ALLEGE EACH MATERIAL ELEMENT OF. THE OFFENSE,AND LACKED SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, CAUSING FRAUD ON THE COURTIWOULD ALL THIS QUALIFY AS AVOID JUDGMENT?

Is the criminal complaint void when it was based on statements from Special Agent Terrance Taylor that were knowingly false and exhibited reckless disregard for the truth to determine probable cause and later at trial he testified contrary to his sworn affidavit?