No. 18-6856
Geary Mohammed Mills v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure due-process jurisdiction standing-issue statutory-interpretation civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-courts jurisdiction standing
Latest Conference:
2019-01-04
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did Petitioner receive equal protection of the laws, i.e., due process in his criminal procedures?
Is Petitioner entitled to relief from judgment that is void under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(4)?
Did Petitioner timely raise his habeas claims within the statutory period?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in its application of the legal standard for determining standing in this case
Docket Entries
2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-12-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 28, 2018)
Attorneys
Geary M. Mills
Geary M. Mills — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent