No. 18-6840

John H. Rosky v. Renee Baker, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Nevada
Docketed: 2018-11-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process economic-wipeout equal-protection fifth-amendment habeas-corpus property-rights standing takings-clause
Latest Conference: 2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)

AMEVDMEST DOUBSLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE BAR BETRAL WGEO, UPON
DIRECT APPEAL, THE COOLCLUSLOH OF THE APPELLATE COURT IS;
OVERLVELMING EUIDEHCE DUES HOT SURPORT CONNICTOR"
AHD THUS AH IMPUED ACQUITTAL,

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment protects the petitioner's property rights against the government's actions that result in a complete economic wipeout of the property's value

Docket Entries

2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2018-11-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 28, 2018)

Attorneys