DOES INVALIDATE LAW WHILE ARMED ALGRAVATED ASSAULT CONUILTIONS MENS REA BECAUSE HE LACKED THE REQUISITE TME CRIME TD COMPLETE

(2) WAS APPELLATE WHEN HE FAILE! INEFFECTIUE CDUNSEL TO RAISE THE ISSUE AS TO WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT TO STRIKE ABUSED ITS DISChETION WHEN IT FAILED 23-110 JUNOR 836 FOR CAUSE IN HIS ORIGINAL MOTION!

(3) WAS APPELLATE CDUNSEL INEFFECTIUE WHEN HE FAILED TO RAISE THE ISSUE AS TD WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETIDN WHEN IT FAILED TO STBIKE JURDR 927 FOR CAUSE IN HLS DRIGINAL MOTION 23-/1C

(4) WAS APPELLATE COUNSEL TO INEFFELTIDE WHEH HE FAILED RALSE THE ISSUE AS TO WHETHER THE COURT ERBED WHEN IT FAILED TD PERMIT LROSS-EXAMINATION OF THE GOVERNMENTS WITNESS KEITH DANIELS OH DINECT AAPEAL RELEVANT TD HIS MENTAL HEALTH STATLIS ?

(5) WAS APPELLATE CDUNSEL INEFFECTIUE WHEN HE REFUSE TD RAISE APPELLANTS ISSUES AFTER APPELUANIS MULTIPLE AND WAITTEN PLEAS ORAL WERE RELAYED TO HIM TO DO sO?

Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions