WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT IMPOSED A DEF'AC']X) LIFE SENTENCE THAT WAS NOT AUTHORIZED BY THE STATUTE OF CONVICTION BY CALCULATING THE DEFENDANT'S LIFE EXPECTANCY PLUS ADDING UP THE EXPECTED GOOD TIME CREDITS OVER THE ENTIRE COURSE OF THE DEFENDANT' ,S SENTENCE AWARDED THROUGH THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS.

WHETHER THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE UNDER RULE 60(b) WOULD ALLOW PETITIONER TO CORRECT HIS UNLAWFUL DEFAGID LIFE SENTENCE WHERE HE HAD PREVIOUSLY PRESERVED THIS ISSUE BY ARGUING, AT SENTENCING, ON FIRST APPEAL ON HIS FIRST 28 USC §2255 MOTION, AND TWO PRIOR 28 USC §2241 POST-CONVICTION NOTIONS.

Whether the district court imposed a defacto life sentence not authorized by the statute of conviction