Allege "INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE" is FEDERAL QUESTION, Petitioner Mr. JOSE RODRIGUEZ, is not the PRINCIPAL Jury Instructions for count one and two, P.C. 187(a), is not in the record to support the vierdict of FIRST DEGREE MURDER.

Allege "NOT TRUE" unanimous jury finding for P.C. § 186.22(b); § 186.22(A); § 190.2(a)(22), is contrary to the law in effect at the time. Sentence term of 82 years to LIFE. P.C.§ 12022.53(d), provides 50 YEARS TO BE REMOVED. Allege LIFE also to be removed. Allege in Conflict to APPRENDI V. N.J. 1530 U.S.466,490(2000) Allege "HARMLESS ERROR" is "NONEXISTANT" from the record in conflict to BRECHT V. ABRAHAMSON, SUPRA, 507 U.S.619; FRY V. PLILER 9(2007) 551 U.S.112 9 168 L. Ed.2d.169127 S.Ct.2321.

Allege "ELEMENTS" in conflict to IN RE WINSHIP, 397 U.S. at pp.364 190 S.Ct.1068 915 L.Ed.2d.368]; JACKSON V. VIRGINIA, SUPRA, 443 U.S, at pp.318 [99 S. Ct.27819 61 L.Ed.2d.560]; U.S. V. GAUDIN 9(1995) 515 U.S. 506,-,115 S.Ct. 2310,2320 9 132 L.Ed.2d.444.

Allege JURY INSTRUCTIONS is in conflict to DUE PROCESS CLAUSE; U.S. CONSTITUTION FIFTH AMENDMENT; IN RE WINSHIP 9397 U.S.358 9 364(1970); U.S. V. O'BRIEN, 130 SCt.21699 2174(2010); IN JOSEPH V. COThE, 469 F.3d441 9 464-65(6th.Cir.2006); U.S. V. CHIANIESE 9550 F.2d.1244,1255 F01-

Allege "REASONABLE DOUBT" distinguishing bets', ween "[S]entencing factors" and "[Ejiements of a crime [that] must be charged in an indictment and proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt, is in conflict to WINSHIP 397 U.S. 358 9364; SULLIVAN V. LA. 9508 U.S.275 9278(1993); CAGE V. LA. 9498 U.S.39,41(1990); FRANCIS V. FRANKLIN, 471 U.S.307 9317(1985); JACKSON V. VIRGINIA,443 U.S.at 312-324.

Allege 'INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL" is in conflict to : U.S. CONSTITUTION SIXTH AMENDMENT FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT; STRICKLAND V. WASHINGTON 9466 LJ.S.668 9 687-88(1984

Whether the petitioner's conviction for first-degree murder lacked sufficient evidence to support the verdict