Whether the Supreme Court should grant certiorari in this case whereas the petition creates an important first impression of the merits, which will have an effect on the outcome of these proceedings. Specfically, Petitioner was denied the protections of the Great Writ in its entirety by the lower court's failure to adjudicate all of his claims presented in his initial § 2255 motion?

Whether the Eleventh Circuit has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings, by failing to remand Petitioner's case in light of establshed Supreme Court precedent Rose v Lundy, 455 U.S. 509 (1982), and Eleventh Circuit precedent in Clisby v. Jones, 960 F.2d 925 (11th Cir.. 1992), as to call for an exercise of this Court's supervisory power?

Whether the Supreme Court should grant certiorari in this case