No. 18-6752

David McGuire v. Ohio

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2018-11-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: brady-violation brady-violations criminal-procedure discovery-violation discovery-violations due-process evidence-disclosure fair-trial fourteenth-amendment police-misconduct remedies
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-02-22
Question Presented (from Petition)

When a discovery violation is discovered mid-trial, does a remedy that fails to order the disclosure of the withheld evidence violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

When a discovery violation is discovered mid-trial, does a remedy that fails to order the disclosure of the withheld evidence violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution?

Docket Entries

2019-02-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-01-22
Brief of respondent STATE OF OHIO in opposition filed.
2018-12-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 22, 2019.
2018-12-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 20, 2018 to January 22, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-11-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 20, 2018)

Attorneys

David McGuire
John Q. LewisTucker Ellis LLP, Petitioner
STATE OF OHIO
Daniel Tuyen VanCuyahoga County Prosecutor's Office, Respondent