No. 18-6750
Response RequestedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: codefendant codefendant-confession confession confrontation-clause criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidence-admission hearsay redaction sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
DueProcess FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-05-09
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Should a court look beyond the four corners of a nontestifying codefendant's confession to determine if introduction of the confession violates the Confrontation Clause?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should a court look beyond the four corners of a nontestitying codefendant's confession to determine if introduction of the confession violates the Confrontation Clause?
Docket Entries
2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-03-29
Brief of respondent Pennsylvania in opposition filed.
2019-02-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 1, 2019.
2019-02-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 14, 2019 to April 1, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-01-15
Response Requested. (Due February 14, 2019)
2019-01-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/18/2019.
2018-10-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 20, 2018)
Attorneys
Pennsylvania
William R. Toal III — District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Rita Pultro
William Patrick Wismer — Petitioner