is theRookerLFeidrñandoctrine constitutional when it fails, "to protect individual rights under the Constitution. . . the purpose of the U.S. Supreme Court", according to Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. & Associate JUstice Anthony N. Kennedy? This case.

Is the Rooker-Feldman doctrice,in RE: above item #1, an "injustice against one individual" & if so than an "injustice against all individuals"? This case.

Is the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, in RE: above item #1, when it denys an individual, the right to a fair trial? This case.

Is the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, in RE: above item #1,applicbable when an attorney of record engages in blacmail, malpractice, breach of contract against in iasè-as well as engaging in perjury & obstruction of justice in a court of law? This case.

Is the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, in RE: above item #1, applicable when Plaintiff's witnesses engage in their testimony before a jury with perjury & obstruction of justice statements which were aided & abetted by the Plaintiff's attorneys of record? This case.

Is the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, in RE: above item 1, applicable when a trial judge accepts hearsay evidence for a TRO & later at jury trial, this hearsay evidence allowed to poisOn the jury' .dècioñ agàinst:the Défeñdant? This case.

Is the RoOker-Feldman doctrine, in RE: above item #1, applicable when The Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act(Calif. Civil Code)ba callydenys an individual's right to free speech by granting authority toa' lIOA's•ROard bfDirectors to estab1ih 1h. CC&Rs as governing documents that denys this "free speech"? This -,case.

Is the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, in RE: above item #5 1&2, applicable when HOA's CC&Rs are invalid,being ambiquous & a defective election process in RE: elected Board member can be removed without reason. This case.

Is the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, in RE: above item 1/s 1&2, applicable when a Calif. Superior Court ruling against any rules that impede,a candidate for HOA's BOD, that candidate's name on the ballot without a nominating comte. endorsement or via petition? This case.

Is Rooker-Feldman doctrine, in RE above item 1/s 1&2, applicable when HOA:sTattorneys of record engage in anti-Semitism, aided & abetted by HOA's General Manager? Ahd, the hate-mongering HOA's BOD, et al, also engage-in against an individual? This case.

Is Rooker-Feldman doctrine, in RE: above item 1/s 1&2, applicable when HOA's "hate-mongering" used to suppress existing defective conditions created by past & current BOD,& its dishonest legal & insurance representatives? This case.

Is Rooker-Feldman doctrine, in RE: above item 1/s 1&2, applicable when Calif. Attorney General given no authority to enforce The Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act, & the local District attorney refuses to get involved in disputes within HOA's

Is the Rooker-Feldman doctrine constitutional when it fails to protect individual rights under the Constitution and the purpose of the U.S. Supreme Court?