THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT IN GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA
AND THE U.S. FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ARE
DENYING PETITIONER EFFECTIVE ACCESS TO THE
COURTS BY OUT RIGHT REFUSING TO LOOK ATOR
ACKNOWLEDGE
AND ADDRESS A FAVORABLE ORDER
OF JUDICIAL NOTICE THAT WAS GRANTED BY
THE
U.S. ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

No
THE INOISPUTED ALLEGATIONS CITED IN
HIS
UNOPPOSED MOTION REQUESTING JODICIAL
NOTICE TO
THE EFFECT OF THE ASSISTANT GOVATTORNEY UNLAWFULLY MANOFAC
ERNMENT
TURING
SUBJECT MATTER
JURISDICTION
AGAINST
PETITIONER SUB JUDICE BYCOMM
IT TING CRIMINAL ACTS AGAINST PETITIONER BY
WILLFULLY AND KNOWINGLY FILING BOTHA FEDERAL
GRAND JURY INDICTMENT AND ARREST WARRANT
THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY PROVEN TO BE FALSE AND
BOGUS VIA JUDICIAL NOTKCE PROCEEDINGS PERFORMEL
AND DETERMINE BY THE U.S.ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT
OF APPEALS. 1) DOES THE PROSECUTOR'SEGREGIOUS MISCONOU
T PN
CAUSING HIS UNLAWFUL PROSECUTION AND IMPRISONMEN
CHoulDNk nrTrTh)ED DE

FROMPRISONFORNOT COMM
PROMPTLY RELEASED
ITTING
CHARGES?

Does the prosecutor's egregious misconduct of filing false court documents unlawfully cause petitioner's unlawful prosecution and conviction?