No. 18-6715
Cortney John Edstrom v. Minnesota
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 4th-amendment apartment-dwellers apartment-search circuit-split civil-procedure civil-rights curtilage drug-detection-dog drug-detection-dogs due-process first-amendment fourth-amendment free-speech reasonable-expectation-of-privacy standing
Latest Conference:
2019-02-22
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a drug-detection dog's sniff of the doorway of an apartment constitutes a "search" under the Fourth Amendment when the apartment is located in a multi-unit building and the doorway is in a common hallway.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for violation of their First Amendment rights
Docket Entries
2019-02-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-01-28
Reply of petitioner Cortney John Edstrom filed.
2019-01-18
Brief of respondent State of Minnesota in opposition filed.
2018-12-19
Brief amici curiae of Fourth Amendment Scholars filed.
2018-12-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 22, 2019.
2018-12-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 9, 2019 to February 22, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-12-10
Response Requested. (Due January 9, 2019)
2018-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-27
Waiver of right of respondent State of Minnesota to respond filed.
2018-11-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 19, 2018)
Attorneys
Cortney John Edstrom
Cathryn Young Middlebrook — Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Fourth Amendment Scholars
State of Minnesota
Jonathan P. Schmidt — Hennepin County Attorney's Office, Respondent