Reasonable jurists would find it debatable whether the evidence was insufficient to find David Trimble guilty of four counts of Aggravated Rape beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia; Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

Reasonable jurists would find it debatable whether the time limit for prosecution had lapsed Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution.

Whether reasonable jurists would find it debatable whether the trial court erred when it refused to allow defense counsel to adequately cross-examine State's witness, in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

Reasonable jurists would find it debatable that Mr. Trimble was denied the effective assistance of counsel as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Reasonable jurists would find it debatable whether Mr. Trimble was prejudiced by both trial and appellate counsel's failure to argue that LSA-C.E. Article 412.2 was unconstitutionally misused at trial, in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

Whether the evidence was insufficient to find David Trimble guilty of four counts of Aggravated Rape beyond a reasonable doubt