No. 18-6699
James Tyrell Drane v. Michigan
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-bargaining plea-withdrawal sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2019-01-11
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. DOES PETITIONER DRANE HAVE A DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO PLEA WITHDRAWAL OR AT MINIMUM A GINTHER HEARING WHERE HIS PLEA WAS UNKNOWING AND INVOLUNTARY, RESULTING FROM THE INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether petitioner has a due process right to plea withdrawal because his plea was unknowing and involuntary, and entered in violation of his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel
Docket Entries
2019-01-14
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
2017-12-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 14, 2018)
Attorneys
James Tyrell Drane
James Tyrell Drane — Petitioner