Octavio Torres Ortega v. Pam Bondi, Attorney General of Florida
QUESTION ONE
DID THE TRIAL COURT ERR IN DENYING A JUDGMENT OF
ACQUITTAL
QUESTION TWO
WAS APPELLATE COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE IN THE
APPEAL PROCESS
QUESTION THREE
WAS COUNSEL INEFFECTIVE BY HIS FAILURE TO CALL AND
EXPERT FOR THE DEFENSE
QUESTION FOUR
WAS COUNSEL INEFFECTIVE BY FAILING TO PURSUE A
SPEEDY TRIAL VIOLATION
QUESTION FIVE
WAS COUNSEL INEFFECTIVE BY FAILING TO MOTION TO
SUPPRESS EVIDENCE
QUESTION SIX
WAS COUNSEL FROM PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE
INEFFECTIVE FOR MOVING TO WITHDRAW FROM THE CASE
FOR A SPANISH SPEAKING ATTORNEY TO BE APPOINTED
QUESTION SEVEN
WAS COUNSEL INEFFECTIVE BY FAILING TO
COMMUNICATE WITH THE PETITIONER
QUESTION EIGHT
WAS COUNSEL INEFFECTIVE BY FAILING TO OBJECT TO
IMPROPER BOLSTERING OF WITNESS
QUESTION NINE
WAS COUNSEL INEFFECTIVE BY FAILINGTO OBJECT TO
POLICE OFFICER'S TESTIMONY BOLSTERING THE
CRDEIBILITY OF VICTIM
did-the-trial-court-err-in-denying-a-judgment-of-acquittal