No. 18-6691
Delilah McCurtis v. Maggie Burke, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process evidence fair-trial ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jury-instructions prior-consistent-statements prior-inconsistent-statements witness-testimony
Latest Conference:
2019-01-04
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHERE PETITIONER WAS DENIED A FAIR TRIAL WHERE THE STATE INTRODUCED EACH OF THREE KEY STATE WITNESSES PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS WHICH WERE UNNECESSARILY DUPLICATIVE OF EACH OTHER AMOUNTED TO INADMISSIBLE PRIOR CONSISTENT STATEMENTS?
WHERE PREJUDICIAL ERROR THE STATE TO CALL AS ITS FIRST WITNESS (VICTIM'S MOTHER)?
WHERE THE PETITIONER WAS DENIED A FAIR TRIAL BY INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL?
WHERE THE JURY QUESTION AS TO SECOND DEGREE MURDER INSTRUCTION?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Where petitioner was denied a fair trial due to the introduction of prior inconsistent statements
Docket Entries
2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-27
Waiver of right of respondent Maggie Burke to respond filed.
2018-08-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 14, 2018)
Attorneys
Delilah McCurtis
Delilah McCurtis — Petitioner
Maggie Burke
Michael Marc Glick — Respondent