No. 18-6686

Grady Pederson v. Minnesota, et al.

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-11-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights double-jeopardy due-process evidence-suppression sex-offender-registry standing statute-of-limitations
Latest Conference: 2019-01-11
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Why was the State of Minnesota allowed to suppress evidence since 11/01/1995?

2. Why were the Sheriffs' and Police Depts. Allowed to misrepresent facts, namely the Minnesota BCA report?

3. Why was Judge Wietzema allowed to misrepresent the facts, imply guilt, namely the DNA report and the Minnesota Plea Agreement for 11/01/1995.

4. Why did she not open up the file that shows that I am not a sex offender?

5. Why were there civil commitments of Murray, Cottonwood and Nobles Counties? They are unfounded, unsubstantiated and they are a study of sex offenders, which I am not.

6. Why am I made to register when the DNA evidence clears me of any association to any crime?

7. Why is the state allowed to reach beyond the statutes of limitations, expired and served sentences?

8. Why is the State of Minnesota allowed to cross lines of genocide?

9. Why is the State of Minnesota allowed to exterminate a person from life when I am not guilty of any crimes they accuse me of?

10. Why was the state allowed in the Counties of Murray, Cottonwood and Nobles to call me a sexual predator when I am cleared by DNA evidence?

11. Why was the secondary charges of commitment and registry allowed to prosecute me? It is life, limb and double jeopardy.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why was the State of Minnesota allowed to suppress evidence since 11/01/1995?

Docket Entries

2019-01-14
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
2018-12-12
Waiver of right of respondents City of Fulda, City of Worthington, City of Windom and their respective Police Departments to respond filed.
Main Document
2018-11-27
Waiver of right of respondents Cottonwood County Sheriff's Dept, Deputy LaCanne, Murray County Sheriff's Dept, Nobles County Sheriff's Dept to respond filed.
Main Document
2018-07-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 14, 2018)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

City of Fulda, City of Worthington, City of Windom and their respective Police Departments
Daniel P. Kutz — League of Minnesota Cities, Respondent
Cottonwood County Sheriff's Dept, Deputy LaCanne, Murray County Sheriff's Dept, Nobles County Sheriff's Dept
Jon K. Iverson — Iverson Reuvers, Respondent
Grady Pederson
Grady Pederson Jr. — Petitioner