No. 18-6667

Khaled Elbeblawy v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2018-11-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: confession criminal-procedure federal-rules-of-evidence impeachment impeachment-use-waiver medicare-fraud plea-agreement plea-bargaining rule-11 substantive-evidence united-states-v-mezzanatto
Latest Conference: 2019-03-15 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Does the impeachment-use waiver doctrine established by the Court in United States v. Mezzanatto, 513 U.S. 196, for plea-related discussions permit the government to introduce in its case in chief at trial a plea agreement signed by the defendant, thereby effectively presenting the jury with a written guilty plea entered without a Rule 11 plea colloquy, in the same way that the government may otherwise introduce a defendant's confession?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the impeachment-use waiver doctrine established by the Court in United States v. Mezzanatto, 513 U.S. 196, permit the government to introduce in its case in chief at trial a plea agreement signed by the defendant, thereby effectively presenting the jury with a written guilty plea entered without a Rule 11 plea colloquy, in the same way that the government may otherwise introduce a defendant's confession?

Docket Entries

2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-12
Reply of petitioner Khaled Elbeblawy filed. (Distributed)
2019-02-01
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2018-12-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 2, 2019 to February 1, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-12-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 1, 2019.
2018-11-30
Response Requested. (Due January 2, 2019)
2018-11-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 13, 2018)

Attorneys

Khaled Elbeblawy
Richard C. Klugh Jr. — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent