No. 18-6653

Rolando Calderin v. Illinois

Lower Court: Illinois
Docketed: 2018-11-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-court-error appellate-review constitutional-rights constitutional-violation criminal-procedure due-process inculpatory-statements miranda-rights right-to-counsel self-incrimination suppression-of-evidence trial-court-error
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2019-01-04
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether Illinois Trial Court and Appellate Court erred when it failed to suppress'
Petitioner's inculpatory statements that were obtained after petitioner made several
unequivocal and unambiguous requests for a lawyer in Violation of Petitioner's Constitutional
Right to Counsel. And whether Illinois Supreme Court erred by refusing to review petitioners
violations in this case.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Illinois Trial Court and Appellate Court erred when it failed to suppress Petitioner's inculpatory statements that were obtained after petitioner made several unequivocal and unambiguous requests for a lawyer in violation of Petitioner's Constitutional Right to Counsel, and whether Illinois Supreme Court erred by refusing to review petitioners violations in this case

Docket Entries

2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-27
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois to respond filed.
2018-08-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 10, 2018)

Attorneys

Illinois
Michael Marc Glick — Respondent
Rolando Calderin
Rolando Calderin — Petitioner