WHETHER FLORIDA ERRONEOUSLY DECIDED
THAT THE TRIAL JUDGE DID NOT DENY
PETITIONER A TRIAL IN ACCORD WITH
FUNDAMENTAL STANDARDS OF DUE
PROCESS, GUARANTEED UNDER THE
FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED
STATES CONSTITUTION, WHEN HE
PREVENTED DEFENSE FROM INTRODUCING A
TAPE-RECORDED JAIL CONVERSATION OF
PETITIONER'S WIFE ADMITTING THAT SHE
HAD COMMITTED THE CRIMES IN QUESTION
AS A STATEMENT AGAINST INTEREST?

Whether the trial judge denied the petitioner a trial in accord with fundamental standards of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment by preventing the defense from introducing a tape-recorded jail conversation of the petitioner's wife admitting to committing the crimes in question as a statement against interest