Does the fact that the district court failed to state in writing its reasons for certifying that Petitioner seeking to proceed in forma pauperis could not be taken in good faith; along with the fact that the district court did not dismiss Petitioner's claim as frivolous; but for failure to state a claim amount to an erroneous certification of lack of good faith?

Was the district court's departure from any of the multiple and varying Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as presented in this petition, contraving of an overriding policy; resulting in manifest injustice?

Was the district court's failure to give Petitioner leave to amend his pro se complaint a manifest injustice rendering the court's judgment on the merits of the claim voidable?

Do the district court's failure to state reasons for certifying lack of good faith, failure to dismiss as frivolous, and failure to allow amendment amount to an erroneous certification?