No. 18-6637

Harold E. Grist, Jr. v. Terema Carlin, Warden

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-11-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-amendment certificate-of-appealability confrontation-clause credibility due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel juror-misconduct jury-trial self-incrimination truthfulness
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference: 2019-01-04
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the Petitioner had a constitutional right to confront his accusers at trial and impeach them before a jury to challenge their credibility and truthfulness ?

Whether Petitioner was denied effective assistance of in all state court proceedings when the district court inferred such ?

Whether juror misconduct and introducing extrinsic evidence in jury deliberations violated Petitioner's rights ?

Whether Petitioner was forced to incriminate himself after his constitutional right ?

Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied a a Certificate of Appealability in direct conflict with the U.S. Supreme Court's mandates governing such ?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Petitioner had a constitutional right to confront his accusers at trial and impeach them before a jury to challenge their credibility and truthfulness?

Docket Entries

2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-19
Waiver of right of respondent Terema Carlin, et al. to respond filed.
2017-12-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 10, 2018)

Attorneys

Harold Grist
Harold E. Grist Jr. — Petitioner
Terema Carlin, et al.
L. LaMont AndersonIdaho Attorney General's Office, Respondent