Harold E. Grist, Jr. v. Terema Carlin, Warden
DueProcess HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure Privacy
Whether the Petitioner had a constitutional right to confront his accusers at trial and impeach them before a jury to challenge their credibility and truthfulness ?
Whether Petitioner was denied effective assistance of in all state court proceedings when the district court inferred such ?
Whether juror misconduct and introducing extrinsic evidence in jury deliberations violated Petitioner's rights ?
Whether Petitioner was forced to incriminate himself after his constitutional right ?
Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied a a Certificate of Appealability in direct conflict with the U.S. Supreme Court's mandates governing such ?
Whether the Petitioner had a constitutional right to confront his accusers at trial and impeach them before a jury to challenge their credibility and truthfulness?