No. 18-6632
IFP
Tags: adverse-consequences article-iii case-or-controversy civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus standing
Latest Conference:
2018-11-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
I.
DOES A COURT OF APPBALS ABURE ITS DISERETON IN REPUSING TO PARMIT
DO 3O PRELLLIDES HABEAS PETTTIONER BROM BVER RAGBIV ING ANY ADUUDICATION
OF HIS CLAUMSON THE MERICS?
π.
THE CASE OR CONTROVBRSY REQUIREMENTOF ARTICLE DII?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Court of Appeals abuse its discretion in refusing to permit consideration of a vital intervening legal development when petitioner's prior habeas petition precludes him from ever receiving an adjudication of his claims on the merits?
Docket Entries
2018-12-03
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2018-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-06-20
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
Attorneys
Danny Howell
Danny Howell — Petitioner