William Foley Miller v. Florida
bid Al-I - Us A y
PJr-/ ss 8r r/ Cos
X 4 b ,"± A c'i I A d
L J A/o* Pocerie , T-<<;
For R v / YA roc A U r
xhus+-ed i4r PricurJ/Y
bFu/i'ei) /6JM Tr A Fi/
i1L LD S C rpws j L/ L o
Th S+a+2 4ppe.//J, !+to('rY
N,tle, Tp Hod i 5c;F;c k/eJ
T1 Mk 4 Srt2. &r/
freuM-rt± IriT/e.- App1Ie &,F 1
tTce T/-,o 5+& Tr,/ CoM1fi'kirt
Fon Errer WA e, n If v I s J4- fl & Lf s M1 r
M i I j/i- a t) A Stc4+e W,i -r c cs
MPrô P ri Y £2 o ivt iW p Q, 'TA g-
F&hr±'5 Reis -f ir Pub/c
bePcr 2
Who did not use any federal case's or federal codes, did not preserve these issues for review that creates an unexhausted and procedurally defaulted claim in a federal habeas corpus §2254, does the state appellate attorney have to have a specific allotment to make a separate federal argument in the appellate brief?