No. 18-6610
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: actual-innocence actual-perpetrator coerced-confession constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process exclusion-of-evidence fair-trial ineffective-assistance-of-counsel newly-discovered-evidence post-conviction-relief prosecutorial-misconduct selective-prosecution successive-petition
Latest Conference:
2019-01-04
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner should be allowed to present newly discovered evidence of actual innocence in a successive post-conviction petition, despite the state court's refusal to consider such evidence
Docket Entries
2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-27
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois to respond filed.
2018-08-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 10, 2018)
Attorneys
Illinois
Michael Marc Glick — Respondent
Mark Johnson
Mark Johnson — Petitioner