Is the Eleventh Circuit's interpretation of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e), or the savings clause correct in McCarthan v. Director of Goodwill Industries - Suncoast, Inc., 851 F.3d. 1076, 1100 (11th Cir. 2017)(en banc)(affirming the dismissal of a § 2241 petition for lack of jurisdiction) where it is in conflict with the 3rd Circuit Appeals and the 4th circuit Appeals court in that new retroactively applicable rules of statutory law may not be brought under § 2241?

Is the Government allowed to substitute simultaneous single occasion qualifying convictions, for convictions that have been overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court and the Appeals Court where they were never brought up at the initial sentencing?

Does Florida Statute 843.01, Resisting an Officer with a Threat of Violence qualify under the ACCA where there is a circuit split between the Eleventh and Tenth, where no actual touching Is necessary for a conviction?

Is the Eleventh Circuit's interpretation of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e) correct?