1.) PlAiNtiff cAuNot Sve tHtE UNited StatEs DepartmertoR veteraNs AFFARS FOR CONstitUtONAL WRONS AGAiNSt HiM FOR DeLiBeRAtE INDIFFERNCE OR 14TH AOMENAMENTUOWTONS, UNDER 28USC1331?(SEEEHAT 1)
PLAiNGIFF CANNOTSUE HE UNITEA STATES OF AMERICA FOr CoNstitutoNAL violAtioNS ot Del BerAte INDiffrAre oR yth ADMeNdENt ViOLALIONS, OR TORT CAMS, UNDER 28 USC133( OR 1383 G)G) (SEE EhIB7 1)
PlaiNtiff caNnot sie Lynette J. TAylon oR EDwnRD Heives Jn VeterANS
CAnpot Sue GovoNeR Brvee RruwerR whO Fs I cltangE ot te State ot Ilmois And signs off on the policles, frocedones And CUStOMS of THE STAtE of ILLinOiS, INUClUding UPON ENfOrAtION And Belref the ILVAme (Icinois veterans medal Centers) ANd THE IlLinois LAw ENforement, To Evclvde THere policies, proceedures And cusfoms (SeeExh:B.t1
Whether the district court erred in denying plaintiff's claims against the Department of Veterans Affairs, its directors, the hospital staff, the state of Illinois and its governor for constitutional violations, tort claims, and failure to provide adequate medical and mental health care