No. 18-6600
Ringo Recto Labrador v. United States
Tags: circuit-split criminal-sentencing empirical-basis fifth-circuit judicial-review methamphetamine-sentencing presumption-of-reasonableness reasonableness-standard second-circuit sentencing-commission sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2018-12-07
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is a sentence imposed under the methamphetamine sentencing guideline–a guideline crafted without benefit of Sentencing Commission expertise or empirical basis–entitled to a presumption of reasonableness?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a sentence imposed under the methamphetamine sentencing guideline entitled to a presumption of reasonableness?
Docket Entries
2018-12-10
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.
2018-11-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 7, 2018)
Attorneys
Ringo Recto Labrador
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent