No. 18-6557
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-rule-11 due-process federal-rules-criminal-procedure plea-bargaining plea-colloquy structural-error united-states-v-gonzalez-lopez
Latest Conference:
2018-12-07
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. WHETHER: THE FED.R.CRIM.P. 11(b)(1)(N) RULE WAS VIOLATED BY THE INADEQUACY OF THE CHANGE OF PLEA COLLOQUY?
2. WHETHER THE DECISION THE THIRD CRICUIT DECISION CONFLICTS WITH 548 U.S. 140 OF THIS COURT IN UNITED STATES V. GONZALEZ-LOPEZ, 150-52 (2006)?
3. WHETHER THE E THIRD CIRCUIT DECISION CREATED A CIRCUIT SPLIT WITH THE FIFTH AND SEVENTH CIRCUITS REGARDING WHETHER THE ERROR"? ADEQUACY OF THE PLEA COLLOQUY CONSTITUTED "STRUCTURAL
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(b)(1)(N) rule was violated by the inadequacy of the change of plea colloquy?
Docket Entries
2018-12-10
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.
2018-11-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-10-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 3, 2018)
Attorneys
Casey O'Dell
Casey O'Dell — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent